KRISTALLARNING TASHQI TA’SIRLAR OSTIDAGI MAGNIT VA MAGNITOOPTIK XUSUSIYATLARI
Keywords:
Kalit so‘zlar: kristall simmetriyasi, magnit anizotropiya, kristall maydoni, magnitoelastiklik, Faraday effekti, Kerr effekti, Voigt effekti, dielektrik tenzor, teskari masala, identifikatsiya.Abstract
Annotatsiya: Ushbu maqolada kristallarning tashqi magnit va elektr maydonlar, temperatura, bosim hamda mexanik kuchlanish ostidagi magnit va magnitooptik javobi nazariy-uslubiy tahlil qilinadi. Magnitlanish, magnit qabul qiluvchanlik va kompleks dielektrik tenzor mikroskopik Hamiltonian hamda termodinamik hosilalar orqali ifodalanadi. Faraday, Kerr va Voigt effektlarining formulalari ularning amal qilish shartlari bilan keltiriladi. Magnitoelastik va fotoelastik bog‘lanishlar kvadratik optik javobda samarali koeffitsiyent hosil qilishi ko‘rsatiladi. Parametrlarni mustaqil aniqlash uchun magnitometriya, spektroskopiya, polarimetriya va deformatsiya o‘lchovlarini birgalikda tahlil qilish, sezgirlikni baholash hamda noaniqliklarni hisoblash mezonlari beriladi. Natijalar umumiy nazariy munosabatlar va o‘lchov usullaridan iborat; tajribaviy sonli ma’lumotlar keltirilmaydi.References
1. Kubo R. Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes. I. General Theory and Simple Applications to Magnetic and Conduction Problems. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan. 1957;12:570–586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.12.570
2. Argyres P. N. Theory of the Faraday and Kerr Effects in Ferromagnetics. Physical Review. 1955;97:334–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.97.334
3. Onsager L. Reciprocal Relations in Irreversible Processes. II. Physical Review. 1931;38:2265–2279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.38.2265
4. Higo T., Man H., Gopman D. B. va boshqalar. Large magneto-optical Kerr effect and imaging of magnetic octupole domains in an antiferromagnetic metal. Nature Photonics. 2018;12:73–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-017-0086-z
5. Raue A., Kreutz C., Maiwald T., Bachmann J., Schilling M., Klingmüller U., Timmer J. Structural and practical identifiability analysis of partially observed dynamical models by exploiting the profile likelihood. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1923–1929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp358
6. Aharoni A. Demagnetizing factors for rectangular ferromagnetic prisms. Journal of Applied Physics. 1998;83:3432–3434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.367113
7. Stevens K. W. H. Matrix Elements and Operator Equivalents Connected with the Magnetic Properties of Rare Earth Ions. Proceedings of the Physical Society A. 1952;65:209–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1298/65/3/308
8. Moriya T. Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism. Physical Review. 1960;120:91–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.120.91
9. Hamrlová J., Legut D., Veis M., Pištora J., Hamrle J. Principal spectra describing magnetooptic permittivity tensor in cubic crystals. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 2016;420:143–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.07.020
10. Berreman D. W. Optics in Stratified and Anisotropic Media: 4×4-Matrix Formulation. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 1972;62:502–510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.62.000502
11. Compain E., Poirier S., Drevillon B. General and self-consistent method for the calibration of polarization modulators, polarimeters, and Mueller-matrix ellipsometers. Applied Optics. 1999;38:3490–3502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.38.003490
12. Lu S.-Y., Chipman R. A. Interpretation of Mueller matrices based on polar decomposition. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 1996;13:1106–1113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.13.001106
